<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>L A Johannesson &#187; genre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lajohannesson.com/category/genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lajohannesson.com</link>
	<description>Romantic fiction with a geeky twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is &#8216;chick lit&#8217; anyway?</title>
		<link>http://lajohannesson.com/2012/12/what-is-chick-lit-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://lajohannesson.com/2012/12/what-is-chick-lit-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L A</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[chick lit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicklit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lajohannesson.com/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I promote my book the descriptor that get tossed around most often is &#8216;chick lit&#8217;. I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8216;eloves me, eloves me not&#8217; sits within this genre. It has many of the characteristics of the great chick lit works of our time &#8211; Sex and The City, The Devil Wears Prada, anything Shopaholic related [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lajohannesson.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/IMG_1138.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-407" title="IMG_1138" src="http://lajohannesson.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/IMG_1138-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>As I promote my book the descriptor that get tossed around most often is &#8216;chick lit&#8217;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8216;eloves me, eloves me not&#8217; sits within this genre. It has many of the characteristics of the great chick lit works of our time &#8211; Sex and The City, The Devil Wears Prada, anything Shopaholic related and let&#8217;s not forget our beloved Bridget Jones.</p>
<p>Some of the typical haracteristics of chick lit are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Written by women for women</li>
<li>Quirky protagonists</li>
<li>Funny</li>
<li>Creates intimacy by use of the first person format (confiding to reader)</li>
<li>Deals with life issues (love,  dating, relationships, marriage, friendships, career, etc.)</li>
<li>Relies on a circle of friends for support</li>
<li>Dead end jobs they usually hate, often with bad bosses</li>
<li>Unsuitable boyfriends or a lack of one</li>
<li>Urban-but no real sense of place</li>
<li>Outrageous situations</li>
<li>Obsessed with fashion, weight, shopping, shoes</li>
<li>Somewhere between &#8216;romance&#8217; and &#8216;literary&#8217;</li>
<li>Often a form of masked memoir</li>
</ul>
<p>Yep, I&#8217;d pretty much say that &#8216;eloves me, eloves me not&#8217; is chick lit through and through. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that.</p>
<p>But it also has a &#8216;geeky&#8217; twist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possibly one of the first to define the new genre of &#8216;digi chick lit&#8217; &#8211; where the additional characteristic of being a &#8216;girl geek&#8217; who&#8217;s adept at the latest in technology would be added to the list.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lajohannesson.com/2012/12/what-is-chick-lit-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
